On Valentine’s Day, the House of Delegates passed a “Women’s Bill of Rights”, assuring the availability of single-sex spaces such as Toilets and Locker Room, assuring the definitions of “male” and “women”, assuring the availability of a single-sex spaces.
Kathy Hayes Crause
“In this room we all know that we cannot stop sexual discrimination if we also cannot define sex,” said the Bill’s major sponsor, R-Putam’s delegate Kathy Kathy Hayes Crause.
The bill passed 87–12 after an hour-long debate and now the kingdom moved to the Senate.
House Bill 5243 made a splash earlier this month, when the village Jim Justice advocated his passage with the relay Gance, a former competitive swimmer who is now active in political issues.
The bill mostly works by defineing “women” and “men,” men “and” women “and” girls “and” boys “and saying those conditions should be used wherever the state law applies.
Therefore, for example, the bill defines a woman as someone with a reproductive system “that produces ova at some point.” It defines the male as someone with a reproductive system “that produces sperm at some point.”
It says, “There are only two sexes, and every person is either a man or woman” and “a person’s ‘sex’ is their biological sex (either man or woman) at birth.”
The bill specifies that a person with differences in sex development, genes, hormones and conditions incorporating the reproductive organs are not classified as a third sex.
The bill specifies that “equal” means “equal” or “equal” in relation to the equality of sexes.
An amendment adopted last week will remove exemption for a spouse in sexual offenses that may occur in a wedding.
“Ever since the 1970s. Supporters of amending equal rights to radical feminists have demanded a world in which men and women are considered exactly the same in every situation, even if it is regardless of physical differences. A world where men and women can never be separated for any reason. The right to stop the rights of women.”
Democrats argued that the bill does nothing to carry on women’s rights – and this West Virginia can reduce the power of the Human Rights Act.
Kayla Young
“This bill reduces the definition of equal in our Human Rights Act, and the 14th amendment says that no one should deny the same security under the law,” said Delegate Kayla Young, D-Kanwa.
“This does not help women in any capacity at all. In fact, it just says that men and women can have a single sex environment. It provides the same thing for men that it does for women, it does nothing for women.”
Nonitra hamilton
Delegate Anitra Hamilton, D-Monongalia said the bill actually targets special members of the communities.
“This bill was never about women,” Hamilton said. “This bill was targeted on a certain population of people, and if we are going to enact laws to influence our kingdom, we have to take cognizance that we should be conscious of all people.”
After the vote passed on the bill, the delegates made a second debate about amending the title of the bill.
De-Kanawha, De-Kanawha, Delegate Mike Pushkin “wrongly proposed women’s bill.”
Most of the representatives voted for a new bill title introduced by Crause: “A bill to amend the code of West Virginia, in 1931, by adding a new article, adding a new article, adding a new article, §16-67-1, §16-67-2, §16-67-3, §16-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-67-5, objectives, objectives, objectives, Establishment of applications;