Story by David Beard, The Dominion Post
Charleston, W.V.
Charles trump
The SB 740 committed a picture, image, video clip, movie, or recording of a real minor and commit crime to change the sexually clear conduct by incorporating the image of a real minor, so it appears that the minor is sexually conducted sexually.
A real minor, Bill says, is anyone, “whether he is alive or a deceased, whose image was under 18 years of age and later a picture, image, video clip, movie, or recordings were sexually conceived sexually.”
The crime will impose a fine of $ 10,000 and/or one to five years.
Chairman of the judiciary Charles Trump, R-Margan, said, “This bill shows the technical abilities of child predators what child predators clearly do now. … It should be a crime and it will happen. ,
Sen Patricia Rooker, R-Jekshan, said that he had received an email from a component only two days ago. The woman’s 14 -year -old son was a victim of this crime. A hunter took a picture of him from his Instagram account and put his face on a naked image. The hunter contacted him, threatened to post an image on social media if he did not pay the money.
The woman went to the police, Rooker said, but she said to her, “We don’t know what we can do about it.”
The vote was 34-0.
SB 741also passed unanimously.
While SB 740 involves using real victims in artificially generated porn, the bill worries about digital or AI-rented porn where the image appears to be minor.
The Bill opens with legislative findings, which gives the reason for the bill.
It said, “The Legislature found that the use of artificial intelligence products to create a lifetime seems to be sexually engaged in sexually apparent conduct of children, which is a growing problem in the United States as already a serious threat, if it is already a serious risk in the United States as a means of avoiding existing restrictions to create child pornography using real children.
It states that AI-related hair porn promotes illegal sexual conduct against children and is the best way to protect the children of the state.
The Bill specifies that the material produced must be porn, which defines the State Code as an appeal for a prurient interest; Painted or describes, in an aggressive manner, sexually taken as a whole and a whole, severe literary, artistic, political or scientific value is lacking.
In the judiciary committee, it was stated that, for example, in a religious painting, cherubs like a naked child would not be qualified as porn.
It criminalization of creation, production, distribution and occupation with the intention of distributing it. It imposes a fine of $ 20,000 and/or one to 10 years.
In crimes against the Children’s unit, a state soldier told the judiciary members that poachers may have terabytes of this goods, which have a similar effect of porn using real children, but have no results.
“It is growing at such a rate, it is becoming extremely difficult to compete, so such a law helps us in that fight,” he said.