Democrats appreciated the passage of the bill, stating that it would remove an unnecessary layer of bureaucracy that is cooked significantly in the process of making rules.
“Removing this bureaucracy makes better decisions,” Sen Jeremy Moss, D-Southfield, said in the Senate floor speech.
Connected:
,
“You want to improve them, you want to give them more teeth, you want to give them a short timeline to work, let’s do it.” “But just the way it was to go back, and let the bureaucracy run on the citizens of this state somehow, this is a dynamicly foolish mistake.”
What do you know here:
- What does the committee do
- Why Democrats want to eliminate it
- Other similar bills are under consideration
What does the committee do
Environment Rules Review Committee is one of the three oversight boards created during the administration of former Republican village rick snider, which gave the industry more voice in making state decisions.
It is made up of appointments including representatives of the industry, which consider the new rules proposed by the state environment department, great lakes and energy.
When the eagle proposes a rule, the committee gets to review a draft and request a change. The committee also has the power to reject the proposed rules, which either forces EGLE to work with the committee to resolve the dispute or submit a report to the Governor defending his decision.
The process of governance can only move forward when the governor is with the Eagle.
Why Democrats want to eliminate it
Democrats and environmentalists have long reduced boards as a “pollutant panel”, arguing that allowing polluting industries to oversee environmental rules. Fox guard is the same for the hen’s house.
They also say that the review board waste public time and money by adding an additional step to a regulatory regulatory process already.
But the supporters of the review panels argue that their existence keeps the state regulators honest, preventing them from writing poorly designed rules that are likely to challenge out groups.
Other similar bills are under consideration
Senate Bill 393 and 394, Senmeri Bayer, Sponsored by D-Bewali Hills, will remove the Environmental Sciences Advisory Board and the Environment Permit Review Commission. Like the Rules Review Committee, both boards were excluded to give new ways to influence the state’s decision making in 2018.