In the Mitchell Triconis Trial, Defense completed 2 on the day of testimony in the test of Mitchell Trokonis.
On Thursday, his testimony was largely concentrated around memory and memory loss from Elizabeth Loftus, a prominent expert on the subject.
His main point – memory can be influenced by factors and circumstances that lead to memory, and the circumstances around remembering that memory.
Loftus spent a good amount of time during direct testimony, with the gamblers that Mitchell is an alternative principle in addition to Trokonis, simply lying to investigators such as prosecutors.
“Memory does not act like a recording device, we don’t see it and do not record it,” Loftas said.
She first went to the jury through her wide research and her knowledge of human memory. Raksha argued the science behind memory, explaining additional details provided in his interviews as discrepancies and interviews of Trokonis.
“The police offers information in interviews that are new information or misinformation and it is a setting cooked for memory contamination,” Loftas said.
She testified by the police investigators to insert details or submit false information by the investigators, making a person a later memories.
Outside the court, John Seanhorn made his reason clear to bring it into lofts, “As we are presenting here, science is an alternative narrative principle that is trying to claim prosecution.”
Prosecutors allege that Trokonis lied to investigators during his interview. During the cross examination of the lofts, the state pushed back that the memory of Trokonis could not be affected by the police investigators, as the additional details that he continued to provide in the interview was not mentioned by the police at any point.
“Did the police suggest her, she was with Mr. Dulos at home?” The Attorney Scene of Assistant States asked McGinness, “No,” Laughs replied.
During the cross examination, McGinness also cited other examples of details, the investigators never mentioned intimate moments including coffee cups and coffee spills and its and photos.
The state pushed the professor to his credibility and possible sympathy for the defendants. OJ Simpson, Timothy McVig and Harvey Venstein, cited their widespread testimony and counseling by the Defense Council in high profile tests, others. This is a line to question that she said that it has been used, but she believes that it is baseless.
“I think it is an inappropriate thing to try to connect the current accused, Mitchell with these people, which are unpopular,” Loftas said.
Others also took a stand for quick testimony, including state police detectives, who interviewed Pavel Gumini, a neighbor of Rialtar, who worked with the neighbor and photos of Photis Dulos.
The afternoon testimony was the atmosphere Michael Rose, who represented Photis Dulos from January to May 2019 when Photis was locked up in a custody battle with Jennifer for five dulos children.
After reviewing a detention report from the 2019 spring, he testified about the performance of Photis Dulos, that defense argued that his motive for Jennifer’s murder was rejected.
Rose said, “He was very happy, whatever was there, you could tell that you can tell, he was just feeling relieved and more optimistic than what I saw him.”
The judge indicated that defense expected to rest his case on Friday.
The Post Memory Expert Michelle takes a stand for defense in Triconis trial – NECN today appeared on breaking news in USA Today.
Disclaimer: The use of videoreddit.edu.vn and the content generated on this website is at your risk. The platform is not responsible for the use that users can make of the material presented here. Although we make every effort to ensure that the information provided is accurate and appropriate, we do not guarantee the accuracy, perfection or relevance of the material.
The website is not responsible for any damage, damage or damage that may arise from the use of this site, which is involved, but is not limited to direct, indirect, contingent, resulting or punitive loss. Users are responsible for their own functions and compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.
In addition, videoredit.edu.vn is not responsible for the opinion expressed by user-related materials or users. We reserve the right to remove any material that we violate our policies or applied laws without prior notice.