Dale. Luke Clippinger, Chairman of the House Judicry Committee, Right, Juvenile Describes part of the Justice Reform Bill.
The Maryland House of Delegates on Friday gave a final approval to their version of a juvenile justice reform measure, which aims to combine accountability and rehabilitation.
The vote on the House Bill 814 was 126-6, with all dissatisfied votes coming from liberal black democrats.
The bill will require State Department of Juvenile Services (DJS) to complete a three -year plan which includes programs for youth who are at the most risk of becoming victims or gun violence. ” The bill states that those programs will be targeted for youths between the ages of 10 to 14 years.
The bill will require children between the ages of 10 to 12 to enter a mandatory turn program if the arrest first involves car theft or some gun offense.
A commission should complete tasks such as the teenage justice reform and emerging and best practices to review the education and turn programs of the department, research on evidence-based programs and review deaths that include children under the supervision of DJs.
“We are better committed to what that commission should do,” del. Cheryl Pasteur (D-Baltimore County) said, who voted for the bill.
Dale. Thomas S. Hachinson (R-Midil noise) mentioned food to describe his support of the bill.
“I am not a piece of pie, but there is no pie. [bill] Not all ways go, but this is a great start, ”he said. “We need to protect our young people.”
Six MPs voting against the remedy were Dells. Gabriel Asavaro (D-Montgomery), Tiffany Ellston (D-Prince George), Debra davis ,
Young said that the bill does not come from a restructural, just the approach.
“We know that the population is going to be the most affected, young, black boys,” he said.
A racial equity impact note suggests that the bill will produce both positive and negative Effect on adolescent services Intake and “possibly impresses black youth to the greatest extent because they are quite high in DJ’s custody.”
Davis stated that he is standing with criminal justice advocates who do not support the remedy, such as ACLU of Maryland, who issued a highly important statement after vote.
“We appreciate six brave representatives who opposed a bill that is operated by media propaganda and not inherent in the best practices or real data,” said Yanet Amanuel, the Director of Public Policy for ACLU. “We need our elected leaders to keep the humanity of black children at the center and give priority to care on cages.”
The House version is the head of the Senate, which can give final approval on its version of the law on Monday night.
Aid
During a briefing on Friday with reporters, Senate President Bill Ferguson (D-Baltimore City) said the highly controversial medical aid-in-dyeing law would not come for a vote this year.
“It doesn’t seem that we have votes to pass it in the Senate,” he said. “I know it will be disappointing for many people, but if there are no votes, we will continue in the education process and take it at a different time when we feel that there is a better chance to pass.”
Senate Bill 443 (And of Life Option Act) Sen Jeff Waldstature (D-Montgomery) was bottled up with the Senate Judicial Action Committee. He serves as the vice -chairman of the committee.
Committee Chairman William C. Smith Junior (D-Montgomery), who attended Ferguson in briefing, said it was about one or two votes from passing in judicial proceedings.
Senate Judicial Action Chairman Sen William c. Smith Junior (D-Montgomery). Brian p. Photo by Sears.
“As people got closer to the vote and held more intensive discussions with their components, people expressed inevitability to move forward at this time,” he said. “I’m really disappointed, but will have to respect the decisions of the individual senators who are listening to their components and listening to their discretion.”
Chairman of House Health and Government Operations Committee, Dell.
The most successful run of the law came five years ago when the House voted for 74-66. However, it was tied 23–23 in the Senate after Rajkumar George County’s former Sen OB Patterson.
Interactions around the Medical Aid-in-Dyeing Act are sensitive and highly emotional.
“On such issues that it is a vote of conscience and so personal,” Smith said.
Two affiliated advocacy groups, Compassion and Choice and Compassion and Choice Action Network issued a statement on Friday afternoon to urge the committee to vote.
“We cannot express how disappointed we are that the legislature cannot pass the end of the life option Act once again,” Donna Smith, the Compass and Choice Action Network for the Maryland Campaign Director said. “It has been nine years since the bill was first introduced in 2015. Every year, I participate in the funeral of advocates who have argued with MPs to pass this kind law and then they die in unnecessary pain because they did not pass it.”
SB 1 gets the first vote
The Maryland Senate is getting closer to updating the quarter-old rules of the state that controls the competitive market for retail electricity.
After two days of discussion, the Senate Committee on Education, Energy and the Environment voted 8–2 on Friday to pursue the Senate Bill 1 on the Senate floor.
In 1999, the Mahasabha passed a law that enables energy suppliers to compete with the rights of monopoly for the right to sell power to the ratperes. Utilities continue to distribute energy regardless of their origin.
Under that law, utilities do not choose to buy electricity from the state electric customers until the default energy suppliers become suppliers. But the marketplace, impartially or not, is largely defined by aggressive and sometimes hunter sales pitches that target ractors with especially low-income retainers with proposals that may look great to be true and often get stuck with uses as a customer suppliers. So many powerful MPs have finally vowed to do something about it this year.
SB 1 will replace the current regulatory plan of the state in many meaningful ways. This will require people who sell power service to obtain state license, good for three years, and meets guidelines to qualify for license and punish for those who break the rules.
However, this week the strips have distanced one of those amendments from different salespers and instead they are fined for violating laws on hired companies.
“The amendments really refine, where we started,” Sen. Malcolm Augustine (D-Prince George), a sponsor of the bill, told his colleagues on Friday, ” “It actually protects the Marylanders. But it also gives a foundation for a green energy market to grow. ,
The way the bill is likely to be transferred to the Senate next week, its house company, HB 267 also likes to get a favorable reception at the House Economic Matters Committee, whose vice chair, Dell Bryan Crossbie (D-Sent Mary), are the main sponsors.
But the energy suppliers are already ready to attack. Any Senate Committee did not vote on Friday, then choose what you use the alliance, funded by NRG and other big companies, began Tweet Among the members of the committee, it depends on how they voted. By the way, two “Nay” votes, two committee Republicans present, Sen Mary Beth Karza (Lower Noise) and Sen Jason C. Was from Gallian (Harford and Cecil).
Re -published
The Post Legislative Notes: The House approved the Juvenile Justice Bill, which after a fierce debate, aid-to-death, the electricity bill advanced for the first time on the braking news in the USA.
Disclaimer: The use of videoreddit.edu.vn and the content generated on this website is at your risk. The platform is not responsible for the use that users can make of the material presented here. Although we make every effort to ensure that the information provided is accurate and appropriate, we do not guarantee the accuracy, perfection or relevance of the material.
The website is not responsible for any damage, damage or damage that may arise from the use of this site, which is involved, but is not limited to direct, indirect, contingent, resulting or punitive loss. Users are responsible for their own functions and compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.
In addition, videoredit.edu.vn is not responsible for the opinion expressed by user-related materials or users. We reserve the right to remove any material that we violate our policies or applied laws without prior notice.