As the test of Mitchell Trokonis continues for the 23rd day on Friday, the judge will determine whether the hearing of contempt on some documents is necessary, the public should never see.
As soon as the court day ended on Thursday, the state prosecutors told the judge that someone in the courtroom gallery expressed a concern that Trokonis was potentially part of the report of seal custody on the performance on his laptop, in court views.
Jennifer Dulos, a mother of five, and her husband, Photis Dulos, Jennifer was under divorce on 24 May 2019.
Police believe that Photis killed Jennifer in a garage of his house in New Canaan and left his children in school and then cleaned the crime site.
Photis Dulos died of suicide in January 2020, when he was accused of killing his wife.
The 49 -year -old Trokonis was dating Photis Dulos when Jennifer disappeared and alleged that he should help cover his wife’s murder, whose body was never found.
He has been accused of murdering, tampering with evidence and plotting to obstruct prosecution and requested not to be guilty and denied any partnership.
Its test started in January.
The jury on Thursday heard limited testimony about the seal custody report.
It was completed and was shown to Photis and Jennifer Dulos that Jennifer was sealed a month before the disappearance and according to pre -testimony, as it includes confidential health information and information about five dulos children.
The state told the judge that the report itself remains under the seal and no one has access to it, including the defendants.
The judge tasked the state’s lawyer’s office to learn more about what the person saw in the gallery and how the person recognized the report whether they were not to see it too.
“The state’s concern is that it is the notion that it can reach a report on its device that it begins that a member of the audience is capable of watching, which is clearly under seal. Therefore, it is related. The second major point is that the second point is that a news behind us was displayed to the public with a news camera and should not have read it,” the Assistant State’s Attorni told the Judges.
Depending on whatever is learned, the judge will decide whether contempt hearing is necessary.
Earlier on Thursday, the state called the Guardian advertisement Litam Michael Mehran to the stand.
As the parent advertisement was appointed Litem, his role was to represent the best interest of the children during the divorce proceedings between Jennifer and Photis Dulos.
He testified about the ups and downs of the detention process.
He said that Photis Dulos was “below, he was worried, upset,” a detention ruled that Mitchell Trokonis was stopped from contacting the children, and claimed that it was affecting his relationship with him.
Mehan then mentioned a phone call with Photis Dulos and Mitchell Trokonis in March 2019.
“He indicated that he was worried that continuous litigation would adversely affect her relationship with Ms. Trokonis,” Mehran said.
After that phone call, Mehan then described the response of Photis Dulos, which was completed a month before Jennifer Dulos disappeared.
“He was a combination of emotions, I think. On one side, he was encouraged. On the other hand, he was upset and angry,” Mehran said.
The prosecutors used this testimony to be in the heart of defense.
He offered in the past days of the trial that his case revolves around the lack of purpose, Photis Dulos had to kill Jennifer as the custody case was bending in his favor.
Defense argues that Fotis had given impression to Mitchell Troconis, even after Jennifer Dulos’s assassination, the detention fight was bending in favor of photos.
But the rescue was accompanied by several objections because they began to join the contents of the report, which the judge considered unfair. The court on Wednesday tightened the reign around the testimony from Mehan, which kept the report out of the testimony.
The jury also watched a new surveillance video from a neighbor of Photis Dulos in Farmington and that day the final testimony was an FBI Special Agent from Kevin Hoyland, who traveled from New Hampshire for testimony about the cell phone records seized from AT & T, which confirmed what was learned in pre -testimony.