The day Adam Montgomery was convicted for killing his daughter in New Hampshire, a lawyer assigned to protect the legal interests of Sadbhav Montgomery in Massachusetts received a stinging reprimand from a public officer.
In the NBC 10 Boston Exclusive interview, the state’s chief child lawyer Maria Mosades says that after his investigation was published, a reliable source came forward to reveal a significant details, which was not revealed in the review of the girl’s case.
“We received information after releasing our report, indicating that harmony was afraid of his father,” Mosades said.
It is not clear that it was reported that Harmani’s counsel was known, but according to Mosades, who had heard the tape recording of court proceedings, Harmoni’s lawyer told the judge that the little girl wanted to live with her father.
“And so the question that I really want to ask, but cannot ask the reasons for the Attorney-client privilege, have you talked with harmony? Have you explained to Harmoni what would it mean to go out of the kingdom for him? ‘
Adam Montgomery was found guilty of all allegations on Thursday in the 2019 death of his 5 -year -old daughter Harmony.
NBC10 Boston on… Instagram: Instagram.com/nBC10Bostontiktok: tiktok.com/@nbc10bostonfacebook: facebook.com/NBC10Bostonx: Twitter.com/NBC10Boston
“That we didn’t know that later did not definitely impress me, because it is reinforced for us how long the decision to send him home was before,” he continued. “And this has disturbed me because the person has been called to share that information.”
Eventually, a judge of Massachusetts allowed Adam Montgomery to get his daughter’s custody. A jury convicted him of his murder on Thursday.
A long list of recommendations for the Massachusetts Court and the Department of children and families of the state appear in the Child Advocate Investigative Report office released in May 2022. Mosades says that he is pleased with the progress of DCF to implement his team’s recommendations till date.
In a statement by NBC10 Boston, Massachusetts Trial Court says it is also working to implement new policies and processes in the OCA report “cover all these important areas”.
However, neither the court nor the DCF has authority over lawyers representing children in custody cases. Change The state’s child advocates want to see in the legal representation field, law may be required.
“I think the recommendation, in which we have not made any progress, is a discussion about what the child’s lawyer should do.” “And this is an issue that should be a matter of primary concern for the legislature.”
Trial Court spokesman Jennifer Donhue released the following statements:
,Based on the recommendations by the Child Advocate’s office and on the internal review of the policies and practices of the court related to the children’s timely placement, the trial court formed a work group in 2022, which included the teenage court judges and chief partners in the care and security proceedings. Members of the working group include children and family departments, committee for public lawyer services and child advocates office.
,Working Group is checking the care and safety policies and procedures, establishing the appropriate time period for permanent placement of children, and identifies and addresses obstacles to achieve durability on time. The work group is in the process of developing all these important areas covering recommendations. Policies and procedures are being investigated by the trial court and the working group, and recommendations are being developed.,
Source
The Post Harmani Montgomery Adam Montgomery, was ‘fear’ from the mass. The investigators were told after releasing the report – NECN appeared for the first time on breaking news in the USA today.
Disclaimer: The use of videoreddit.edu.vn and the content generated on this website is at your risk. The platform is not responsible for the use that users can do of the material presented here. Although we make every effort to ensure that the information provided is accurate and appropriate, we do not guarantee the accuracy, perfection or relevance of the material.
The website is not responsible for any damage, damage or damage that may arise from the use of this site, which is involved, but is not limited to direct, indirect, contingent, resulting or punitive loss. Users are responsible for their own functions and compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.
In addition, videoredit.edu.vn is not responsible for the opinion expressed by user-related materials or users. We reserve the right to remove any material that we violate our policies or applied laws without prior notice.