Biden’s Super Bowl shrinkflation blame game – Daily News

The President Joe Biden wants to remind you that your super bowl was more expensive than the party. The reason, he claims, is corporate greed and “shrinkage”. In a social media video before Sunday night’s game, he “talked about companies selling small-to-normal products, where the price remains the same.” He opposes this behavior and “calling big consumer brands to stop it.”

This is a very amazing step. There is a straight line between shrinkage, inflation and its fiscal irresponsible of the biden administration.

Shrink is real. This occurs when companies reduce the size or volume of their products while maintaining the same sticker value, effectively increase the actual price. In this case, biden indicates finger as two main convicts in snack-food and sports-drink industries. Have you seen that your Getorade bottle has become a little smaller? Does your chips bag feel more filled with air than ever? This is probably not your imagination.

Nevertheless, Biden’s complaint would be fun if it was not so sad. As dominic Pino explains in the National Review, if the packaging represents the content of the product accurately, the shrinking is legal. In addition, the food and drug administration controls packaging practices like “Slack Phil”, the main purpose of which is food protection practices, not to ensure against small parts as the biden claims. And yes, it is true that some vendors have reduced the contents of their packages without changing prices, but this adjustment returned to 2022.

Why 2022? This is the most important part.

There was a wave of shrinkage in response to an increase in the experience of the country launched by the country starting in 2021. I am surprised that the President will now make such a big deal with this. The administration is trying to fool voters in accepting the fact that inflation has made an angry with the idea that prices have originally returned. This is not the case. While inflation has declined, the price of food is 20% on average since February 2021. Chicken and bread are 25% above, and the fare is still powerful.

These high prices explain why voters continue to disappoint about the economy despite low unemployment, positive economic growth and rising wages.


Finally, the President’s bachelor against companies is a weak attempt to distract us from the fact that his (and their preceding) policies caused inflation during the epidemic. My former co-worker William Beach, who led the Bureau of Labor Statistics, pays attention to a new economic policy innovation center, titled “Is inflation the result of excessive deficit expenses?”

As the beach reminds us, the total federal deficit amount from 2020 via 2023 was $ 8.8 trillion. These are the largest MorTime losses in American history, nominal context and as a percentage of GDP, and they include a lot of expenses passed by Biden after most of the epidemic crisis and the economy was recovering.

This deficit dollar infraston increased by 25.4% in American bank assets between 2020 and 2021, leading to a significant increase in borrowings. In consumer loans, 19.2%, real estate loan increased by 12.1%and total loans up to 13.7%. It was the most sufficient lending jump since the leading period for the great recession. Additionally, between March 2020 and April 2022, a comprehensive measure of money supplies increased $ 5.4 trillion – at that time about a third of America’s GDP.

The beach correctly notes that alternative explanation for inflation-like supply-chain disruption, value gauzing and modern monetary principles are associated with the idea that the government’s expenses should not worry about we should not worry. The same blames for shrinking on the greed of companies, opposite to a government that injected the economy with excessive purchasing power and brought about a inflation crisis, leaving to find ways to adjust all of us.

The best part of the beach report comes when it reminds us that while politicians are responsible for starting recent inflation, they also have the means to stop it. Although prices may not return to the level of 2020, Congress may increase the tax code, withdraw the rules and move towards independent policies, possibly increase income to reduce the family’s budget to increase economic efficiency and productivity.

The Congress can also finally be serious about spending cuts. This will do a lot to help the Federal Reserve fully inflation. Breaking companies for increase in the price of inflation is both wrong and cowardly.

Veronic de Ragi is George Gibs Chair in the political economy and a senior research companion at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University.

Leave a Comment