Conflict prevents election board from hearing complaint – Chicago Tribune

The Lake County Board of Election said on Tuesday that she would like to address the issue of duplicate address in her voting role, but since it was nominated as defendants in the complaint, it could not do so morally.

Republican Board member Michael Mellon said that as a defendant in the complaint, it keeps officers and employees of the Election Board in an indefinite position because the contained struggle creates complaints.

“I think we are struggling against listening to it. I have an vested interest to not rule against me. It needs to go into a separate body, ”said Melan.

Carrolker filed a complaint on 31 October, with 33 registered voters in UPS store, 2187 in 45th cents, 2152 in Capella 2152 in 45th cents, 800 in Kennedy Avenue, two registered voters at the US Post Office at the US Post Office – all in the highland – and as the Lake County Board of Elections.

In the complaint, Parker alleged that the Lake County Board of Elections could fail to secure valid documents from registered voters and these 36 voters may have registered to vote and vote from those addresses.

He asked in the complaint whether registered voters are allowed to use post office boxes and commercial addresses for their voting. He also asked what precautions are being taken to ensure that other lake county registered voters are not using business or post office addresses for their current addresses.

Parker told the board that she would remove them as respondents and accused the board not to want to listen to the matter.

Democrat’s board chairman Kevin Smith said that the officials cannot do so as it has been filed. He said that the board cannot give legal advice. It will be even the parker to determine which body the body will determine to file a original complaint or to amend the present.

“This board wants to hear a complaint about fully registered voters,” Meleon said. “The board wants to listen to those people and is for those open public discussions. However, this is my problem, you have listed us … I basically have to ignore this complaint and wait for another, ”said Melon.


Smith agreed. He said that Parker raised an interesting topic, but he did not think that it would be helpful for the board to listen to it.

Both Republican and Democratic Board lawyers, Carly Brandenberg and Michael Tolbert, agreed to assess the complaint of Melon, respectively.

Even though the authorities ruled in or against the complainant, their actions can be called in question as the election board is named in the suit, the lawyers said.

Generally, complaints are filed with the Election Board against cases related to candidates, campaign finance reports, unfair voter registration and other elections related to other elections. Then, the Election Board hears one of its regularly scheduled meetings.

Parker is one of a cadre of conservators, participating in the Lake County Council, Commissioner, Board of Elections and recently Health Board meetings, seeking accountability on matters in line with far-flung talks.

The group successfully held the election board successfully to cancel its contract with Konak Corp in Michigan, successfully put up the Election Board, for the Polchiff Polle Worker Management Software purchased in 2020. Without evidence, he said the software was being used to send the personal identity information of pole workers to China. The board eventually went to cancel the contract in August.

County never implemented software, whose purchase and proposed use attracted the IRE of the group that attended the meetings for about a year to complain about the software and demand its cancellation. County suspended its implementation in 2022, while the allegations about storage of information in Los Angeles County were investigated. The case was released a few weeks later.

In January, Los Angeles County was ordered to pay $ 5 million to CEO Eugene U $ 5 million after a case was filed in 2023, claiming that the arrest claimed the arrest of more than $ 80 million in business.

At that time, Melon said that the move to cancel the contract was not due to pushbacks from some residents, nor does it confirm the validity of concerns raised by people, contrary to software implementation.

“I think the pushback of the community clearly looked at us software; And in reviewing the software, we realized that we were not using it, ”Melan said, if the software is not being used, it’s probably time to cancel it.

[email protected]

Leave a Comment