According to the judge, who presided over the case at Stamford, Mitchell Trokonis’s defense team is expected to rest his case on Friday.
The case of what happened to Jennifer Dulos, the mother of five, is the case center, which has been missing since May 24, 2019, and has been considered dead. She disappeared after leaving her children in school in the morning.
Police believe that Jennifer’s Astraged Husband, Photis Dulos attacked her new Canaan Ghar and killed her.
Photis Dulos died of suicide in January 2020 after the charge of killing Jennifer Dulos. He denied the allegations.
At the time of his disappearance, he was struggling with each other in controversial divorce and child custody.
Trokonis Photis was dating Dulos and Jennifer was staying with her in Farmington after Dulos and children left.
She denies the allegations that she helped Fotis Dulos cover Jennifer Dulos.
On Thursday, Professor Elizabeth Loftus, a memory of memory, testified on memory and memory loss.
Prosecutors allege that Trokonis lied to investigators during his interview.
Loftus said on Thursday, “The memory recording does not work like a device, we don’t see it and do not record it.”
Raksha argued that the science behind memory explains additional details provided in his interview with the police in his interview with the police.
“The police offers information in interviews that are new information or misinformation and it is a setting cooked for memory contamination,” Loftas said.
He testified that the police may create memories that a person later accepts the truths by the investigators to incorporate details or to present false information by the investigators.
During the cross-execution of lofts, the state pushed back that the memory of Trokonis could not be affected by the police investigators, as additional details that he continued to provide in the interview was not mentioned by the police at any point.
Outside the court, Trokonis’s Attorney, John Seanhorn. To bring into the lofts clarified its reason, “as we are here,” an alternative narrative theory for science is trying to claim prosecution. ,
During the cross-examination, the Attorney Scene McGinness of the Assistant States also cited other examples of the details, the investigators never mentioned the intimate moments between the coffee cup and the coffee spill, and their and the photos.
The state pushed the professor to its credibility and potential sympathy for the defendants, in which OJ Simpson, Timothy McVig and Harve Venstein in high profile tests such as the Defense Council in high profile tests, cited their widespread testimony and counseling from the Defense Council for others.
This is a line to question that she said that it has been used, but she believes that it is baseless.
“I think it is an inappropriate thing to try to connect the current accused, Mitchell with these people, which are unpopular,” Loftas said.