Fourteenth years ago, California adopted a master plan for higher education, which, among other things, determines the operational parameters for three college systems in the state.
The University of California will have a research center in addition to graduation and graduate degrees for doctorates in major fields of studies including medical and law.
The California State University System, as named later, would also provide a bachelor’s degree, which focuses on businesses such as education and engineering, and a master’s degree in its subjects.
The Community College System will provide a collection of locally managed colleges in the system-existing and provide the following-division classes that will prepare students for transfer to UC and Graduate Degree programs in UC and State Universities.
According to the demographic and economic conditions of the state, such as these arbitrary definitions of academic turf became complicated and affecting Mazes for students. The transfer was required for the transfer, the rivalry developed between the three systems for the money and the students, and the cost of higher education struggled.
The State University System sought legal rights to start a doctorate offer in some fields, thus opposed to UC, which claimed a monopoly on those degrees. With this token, state universities opposed efforts by community colleges to offer a four -year backlore degree in some areas, which CSU schools shocked.
Later a success took place nine years ago when the Legislature gave 15 community colleges a very limited pilot program to graduate in some areas. Three years ago, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed the law to make the pilot program permanent and expanded 30 more Backkorite Authority in additional areas that do not struggle with the offerings of state universities.
The expansion strongly criticized the CSU system, even though it was successfully trying to expand its rights to the doctorate at that time, attacking UC Turf further.
Now it seems that the expansion of community colleges is a permanent event in a four -year degree. Whatever it is, it has been overdose for a long time.
Many other states moved in that direction years ago – Florida most particularly – and California lagged behind only three separate higher education systems, which protected their specified roles from jealousy.
Two years ago, a UC Davis Research Center, a UC Davis Research Center dedicated to community college issues, was published that it was indicated that the limited authority for the Backlore of Community College, or CCB, has also been extremely beneficial for students in terms of availability and cost.
“Since the 1970s, since the 1970s, the CCB has expanded the national level as a part of the strategy to add to the bachelor’s degree in the labor market and increase the strength of social and economic mobility,” the report stated the report. “California CCB is closely connected to local jobs and economies by providing location-based backlurits in the applied areas of the study and provides more students-especially low income, first generation of color students-first generation students-an accessible and inexpensive path for bachelor’s degrees with value in local labor markets.”
During the first five years of the initial pilot program, incorporating 15 community colleges and 15 separate areas, from Morchery Science to Dental Hygiene, the study found that all but some graduates found employment and saw that their personal income had increased rapidly.
The success of CCBS so far is trying to widen the program, but what exactly the need is an overhaul of the 64 -year master plan for higher education, which has outlined its utility.
After taking the decision of the Legislature, the college and the program by the college, which the college should provide to the college, is arbitrary micromanization. The goal should create opportunities to make wide and costly for higher education.
Dan walters are a calmatters columnist.
Disclaimer: The use of videoreddit.edu.vn and the content generated on this website is at your risk. The platform is not responsible for the use that users can do of the material presented here. Although we make every effort to ensure that the information provided is accurate and appropriate, we do not guarantee the accuracy, perfection or relevance of the material.
The website is not responsible for any damage, damage or damage that may arise from the use of this site, which is involved, but is not limited to direct, indirect, casual, resulting or punitive loss. Users are responsible for their own functions and compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.
In addition, videoredit.edu.VN is not responsible for the opinion expressed by user-related materials or users. We reserve the right to remove any material that we violate our policies or applied laws without prior notice.